Arizona SB 1070 training enforces dangers of racial profiling, factors of reasonable suspicion

Arizona’s new SB 1070 law has surely generated more excitement in the past few months in the media than it did during the Pima County Sheriff’s Department training session on Wednesday.

Pima County sheriff deputies take in the SB 1070 training session Wednesday/Ryn Gargulinski

Rather than chills and thrills, we were instead treated to a two-hour video, courtesy of the AzPOST Digital Training Series, hosted by a blond woman who concluded by reminding law enforcement members to “always wear your safety vests.”

The “we” in this case were about a dozen sheriff deputies – “a small group this time” – and a handful of media types who accepted the invitation to attend the afternoon session.

Perhaps the media presence explained the “small group” of deputies this time around.

Media may have outnumbered deputies, complete with folks from a TV station from as far away as Germany.

Having German TV on hand proves how far this law is reaching, as well as a major point brought up in the video:

“The scrutiny (Arizona law enforcement) will be placed under over the next few months will be unlike any you’ve ever seen.”

Deputies were warned they would likely be audio-taped, videotaped, provoked and baited during the early weeks of the law, which goes into effect July 29.

While the world is swirling over SB 1070, which already has a federal lawsuit lodged against it, the deputies took the new measure more as a matter of course, just another new law. They get trained on new laws all the time.

“All this is blown out of proportion,” said Deputy Scott Woodworth of the controversy and brouhaha surrounding the measure. He was kind enough to share a word following the video.

Deputy Trevor Tuminello/Ryn Gargulinski

Deputy Trevor Tuminello, who was also willing to chat, added, “I think people are just afraid we’re going to go out and say, ‘Hey you! Hey you! Are you here illegally?’”

That’s not what the law says to do. The law doesn’t even begin to apply unless a person is stopped or detained for another reason, the video reminded us.

Even if a person who appears suspicious makes “consensual contact” with an officer, the officer cannot ask about immigration status. Nor can a deputy ask immigration status of a victim or witness, only a person who “committed a crime, is in the midst of committing a crime or is about to commit a crime.”

And law enforcement officers can only inquire about immigration status if they have “reasonable suspicion.” Reasonable suspicion does not include racial profiling, a fact bludgeoned into the brain by one of the video’s mantras:

No racial profiling. No racial profiling. Racial profiling is a violation of civil rights.

“Hispanic appearance is not enough for reasonable suspicion,” said the video. “Imagine the suspect was white, black or any other color – would you still have the reasonable suspicion?” If not, you are engaging in racial profiling.

“Race and ethnicity is not a crime.”

Reasonable suspicion, thus, relies instead on the “totality of the circumstances.” None of the factors is a red flag on its own, but several can raise the flag when taken as a whole.

Singular factors that can work together “in totality” to form reasonable suspicion that someone is in the country unlawfully:

No ID, especially in situations, like driving, where ID is needed
A foreign ID or foreign registered vehicle
A heavy vehicle packed with people trying to hide
Fleeing
Not being able to give a home address or answer how long they’ve lived there
An evasive manner, nervousness, no eye contact
Being around other illegal aliens or in location illegal aliens are known to frequent (i.e. places they hang around and wait for work)
Pretending not to know all the other illegal aliens around them or in the vehicle with them
Looking out of place, lost or uncomfortable
Not being able to explain where or how they got their Visa
Dress – if wearing layers, long sleeves or other clothes not consistent with climate or having bags of clothing and other articles that appears they have been carrying

And as wacky as it sounds, the video also noted that some people will actually come out and readily admit to law enforcement they are in the country illegally.

That one also works as a factor in reasonable suspicion.

Not being proficient in English – or even able to speak it at all – may work as a small factor, as long as deputies remember many legal citizens are not proficient in the language.

Deputies were also warned to fully document the reasons behind their reasonable suspicion in detailed reports. Detailed and solid enough to hold up in a court of law.

If reasonable suspicion exists, officers are to call ICE or Border Patrol to check on immigration status and, if the person is here unlawfully, to take the illegal entrants away. Homeland Security also has a law enforcement helpline.

Although law enforcement officers are obligated to ask about immigration status, this obligation only holds “when practicable.”

This means they can opt not to ask if it will impede their investigation in any way, such as messing up a major bust on a drug or human smuggling ring, or if other issues take priority.

“If we get a call where Wal-Mart has a shoplifter and only five deputies are available,” said Tuminello, “and then we get a call of someone breaking into a house, we’re going to go for the more critical situation. This is the way this law will work out, too.”

In other words, deputies will not be ignoring mayhem, bloodshed and murder because they are too busy asking someone about their immigration status.

The video also went on and on about the types of identification non-immigrants who are in the country legally may carry – as well as the fact that a green card had not been green for about 70 years until recently revised.

The media was invited to the sheriff's SB 1070 training on Wednesday/Ryn Gargulinski

The loads of information may have been overwhelming for a civilian, yet the deputies appeared to take it in stride. They are used to all the legalese and nuances of many laws. They are sworn to uphold them.

As the video also mentioned, we need to give them the credit they deserve, especially when it comes to sound practices with things like SB 1070.

“I trust my officers,” said the bill’s sponsor, Arizona State Sen. Russell Pearce during the video’s long-awaited conclusion. “In this bill I have given them discretion.”

Perhaps we all need to trust they will do the right thing. Racial profiling is not only unethical, but it can ruin a career.

The best vote of confidence for our local law enforcement, however, may have come during the media Q and A. I got a chance to ask the room full of deputies to respond with a show of hands to two questions: how many absolutely hated the new law, found it a pain in the butt, and then how many absolutely loved it.

All were smart enough not to raise their hands in response to either inquiry.

Add’l notes:

ARS 11-1051 is where you’ll find SB 1070 (and HB 2162).

ARS 13-2928 and ARS 13-2929 also contain new info. The first deals with hiring illegal aliens off the street or stopping to pick them up and take them to a workplace. The second pertains to transporting, concealing or inviting aliens to come to Arizona.

In addition to the friendly blond host, the video featured a handful of speakers from the AzPOST Training Board. They included Attorney Beverly Ginn from Edwards and Ginn; Hipolito Acosta, United States Customs (Ret.); Pinal County Sheriff Paul Babeu; Arizona Police Association Executive Director and retired Phoenix police officer Brian Livingston. Tucson Police Chief Roberto Villasenor was also on the video, making it perfectly clear SB 1070 was not much favored but making it equally clear his department would enforce it as prescribed.


[tnipoll]

What do you think?

Do you have any concerns about how SB 1070 will be enforced?

Do you have faith Arizona peace officers will follow the law to the letter?

Advertisements

About Rynski

Writer, artist, performer who specializes in the weird, wacky and sometimes creepy. Learn more at ryngargulinski.com.
This entry was posted in Crime, danger, immigrants, life, Police/fire/law, politics and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

12 Responses to Arizona SB 1070 training enforces dangers of racial profiling, factors of reasonable suspicion

  1. leftfield says:

    Do you have any concerns about how SB 1070 will be enforced?

    Does the pope wear a funny hat while he defecates in the woods?
    Do you have faith Arizona peace officers will follow the law to the letter?

    Oh, of course.  When have occifers of the law ever failed to discharge their responsibilities with the utmost integrity (that is, so long as you don’t forget to make your payments to the Police Benevolent Society on time).  I mean, you can ask Abner Louima or Rodney King for an endorsement if you don’t believe me.  Bull Connor, Joe Arpaio, J. Edgar Pooh Bear – all fine citizens.

    • Rynski says:

      ha! i had no idea about the pope in the woods, leftfield!
      now how did i figure you’d have a response similar to the one you posted? hahahahha – and good examples to back it all up.
      i’ll agree louima et. al. were some blaring, horrible situations – but i would also say MOST law enforcement folks are not prone to creating those situations.

  2. radmax says:

    Nice article Rynski! I bet the officers were briefed in advance to be noncommittal on feelings about this important legislation. Still, would have been nice to be able to get a feel for how this would affect their job and personal feelings towards it’s impact.
    Really well written!

    • Rynski says:

      thanks, radmax!
      good guess on your noncommittal briefing – either that or they were wondering who the heck is this gal? hahahahahahah
      i, too, would be interested in their honest opinions of it…maybe i can go undercover one day and find out – hahahah.

  3. erniemccray says:

    And it don’t snow in Minneapolis in the winter time. Hey, based on my 72 years of life in the good old USA which I love by the way, I can’t imagine the concept of “no racial profiling.” It’s as American as apple pie. We do it non-stop everyday. But we shall see, won’t we?

    • Rynski says:

      hey erniemccray –
      perhaps no ‘conscious’ racial profiling would be a better way to put it?
      and yes we – and the rest of the world – are certainly on the edge of our seats, waiting to see.
      thanks for input.

    • Melody Y.J. Poor says:

      I am of Asian descend and I have been an American citizen for 32 years.
       
      I have travelled to Canada and Mexico by car with my Anglo husband at least five times and each time at the border, I was always asked to show my I.D. (I automatically showed my passport) but my sandy blonde hair husband was NOT asked to show his I.D. — I never shout any “racial profiling” slogans because I am a LEGAL immigrant and I was very glad to show my LEGAL document.

  4. sethers says:

    @ the poll results – I believe it was Reinhold Niebuhr who said that groups tend to be more immoral than individuals.  

    • Rynski says:

      hey sethers – group mentality can get ugly, and quickly.
      angry mobs comes to mind – as do lemmings all following suit by leaping to their deaths. at least the  lemmings only hurt themselves – unless they land on someone’s face or something…hahaha
       

  5. MattV says:

    Do you have faith Arizona peace officers will follow the law to the letter?
    They damn well better!  It’s their job to enforce the laws.  As long as it’s on the books they will enforce it.  We can’t have police officers deciding which laws are worthy of enforcement.
    Don’t want to enforce it?  Get in another line of work then

  6. elfie says:

    I have read so much on the Racial Profiling fear my eyes are crossing. 1st: the DOJ didn’t even sue on that point (which really doesn’t matter b/c the DOJ is weak and full of puppets).
    2nd: Do you not think that Arizona law enforcement have seen enough to know an illegal when they see one? I mean seriously.  If  you have done your job for any length of time certain things about it become clear.  I can spot a wage claim coming a mile away.  Illegals are pretty much easy to spot if you are used to seeing them and dealing with them.  Occassionally one will get by but that’s ok so long as one innocent isn’t hurt….good mentality right. 
    I have complete faith that the Arizona Law Enforcement officers will go about their daily routine only now they have the right to say, “umm, hey, ID please” and act when none is forth coming. 
    I’ve also heard the sobs about making the immigrants carry their papers.  How many times can it be said that they have to anyway! That is not new.  What’s new is the concept of actually enforcing it.
    I want to move to Arizona after the law is in place.  I’m not worried about asking for ID – I was just asked for it at the doctors office when I went for a test.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s